Two-step Iteration Process for Nonexpansive Mapping in CAT (0) Space

 

M.R. Yadav

School of Studies in Mathematics, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) India-492010

*Corresponding Author Email: yadavmryadav@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

In this paper, we have proved D and strong convergence theorems for the two step iteration scheme of nonexpansive mappings in the frame work of CAT(0) space. The results obtained in this paper represent an extension as well as refinement of previous known results.

 

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010): 54H25, 54E40.

 

KEY WORDS:  Two-step iteration scheme, Nonexpansive mapping, CAT(0) space, and strong convergence, Common fixed point.

 

1 INTRODUCTION:


The study of fixed point theory in CAT(0) spaces of various classes of mappings using different iterative schemes have been the focus of vigorous research paper for many authors. In the last three years many research paper have been published on the iterative approximation of fixed points in CAT(0) space, using several iteration process such as Mann and Ishikawa iteration process. The fixed point theory for single-value and multivalued mappings in CAT(0) spaces has been rapidly developed and much research paper have published (see [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [11], [12], [13], [14]). A CAT (0) space is geodesic space for which each geodesic triangle is at least as ’thin’ as its comparison triangle in the Euclidean plane. A notion of convergence introduced independently several years ago by Lim and Kuezumow is shown in CAT(0) space to be very similar to the usual weak convergence in Banach space.

 

In 1976 Lim [15] introduced a concept of convergence in a general metric space setting which he called -convergence. Kirk and Panyanak [13] specialized this concept to CAT(0) space and showed that many Banach space results involving weak convergence have precise analogs in the setting. Dompongs and Panyanak [6] continued to work in this direction. Their results involved Mann and Ishikawa iteration scheme involving one mapping.

 

In 2010, Puttasontiphot, T. [17] has prove strong convergence theorem to approximate fixed points of quasi-nonexpansive multivalued mappings by the Mann and Ishikawa iteration process in the frame work of CAT(0) spaces. Fixed point theory in CAT(0) spaces was first studied by Kirk (see [9], [10]). He showed that every nonexpansive mapping defined on a bounded, closed, convex subset of a complete CAT(0) space always has a fixed point.

 

In this paper, inspired by the above fact, we prove  and strong convergence theorems of the two step iteration scheme defined by Thianwan [19] for nonexpansive mappings in the CAT(0) spaces.

 

 


Let K be a nonempty convex of a complete CAT(0) space X and be a given mapping. Then for a given , computer the sequences  by the iterative scheme:


 


 

                                        (1.1)

Where ,  are appropriate sequences in [0, 1]. If  for all , then (1.1) reduces to Mann iteration scheme:

                                              (1.2)

where  is in (0, 1).

 

2. PRELIMINARIES:

Let (X, d) be a metric space. A geodesic path joining to  (or, more briefly, a geodesic from x to y) is a map c from the closed interval to X such that c(0) = x, , and for all . In particular, c is an isometry and . The image of c is called a geodesic (or metric) segment joining x and y. When it is unique this geodesic segment is denoted by [x, y]. A geodesic triangle  in a geodesic metric space (X, d) consists of three points  in X (the vertices of ) and geodesic segment between each pair of vertices (the edges of ). A comparison triangle for the geodesic triangle  in (X, d) is a triangle   in the Euclidean plane  such that  for , .

Now, we give the following definitions which will be used in the our main result:

Definition 2.1. Let be a geodesic triangle in X and let  be a comparison triangle for . then  is said to satisfy the CAT(0) inequality if for all  and all comparison points , then

.

If are points in a CAT(0) space and if is the midpoint of the segment then the CAT(0) inequality implies

.                              (2.1)

This if the (2.1) inequality of Bruhat and Tits [2]. In fact (see [1]), a geodesic space is a CAT(0) space if and only if satisfies the (2.1) inequality.

Let  be a bounded sequence in CAT(0) space X. For , we set

.

The asymptotic radius of  is defined by

and the asymptotic center of of  is the set

.

Definition 2.2. The space (X, d) is said to be a geodesic space if every two points of X are joined by a geodesic and X is said to be uniquely geodesic if there is exactly one geodesic joining x and y for each . A subset is said to be convex if Y includes every geodesic segment joining any two of its points.

 

Definition 2.3 ([13], [15]). A sequence  in a metric space X is said to - converge to if x is the unique asymptotic center of {un} for every subsequence  of . In the case we write   and call x the −limit of .

 

Definition 2.4. Suppose K be a nonempty subset of a CAT(0) space X and a mapping is said to be nonexpansive if for all . We know that a point is a fixed point of T if Tx = x, i.e., .

 

Definition 2.5. A mapping is said to satisfy condition (I) [18] if there exists a nondecreasing function with f(0) = 0 at f(r) > 0 such that for all , where .

Now, some elementary lemmas about CAT(0) spaces which will be used in the proofs of our main results:

Lemma 2.1 ([13]). Every bounded sequence in a complete CAT(0) space always has a -convergence subsequence.

 

Lemma 2.2 ([5]). If K is a closed convex subset of a complete CAT(0) space and if  is a bounded sequence in K, then the asymptotic center of  is in K.

 

Lemma 2.3 ([6]). Let (X, d) be a CAT(0) space.

(i) For and , there exists a unique point such that

and .                                        (LL)

We use the notation for the unique point z satisfying (LL).

(ii) For  and , we have

.

(iii) For x, y 2 X and t 2 [0, 1], we have

.

 

3. MAIN RESULTS:

In this section, we have proved  and strong convergence theorem and find approximate

common fixed points of self mappings T. In the consequence, F denotes the set of common fixed point of the mappings F(T).

 

Lemma 3.1.  Let K be a nonempty bounded, closed, convex subset of a complete CAT(0) space X and suppose be a nonexpansive mapping with , where F(T) is the set of fixed points of F(T). Let  and  be the sequences defined by (1.1), where  and  be real sequences in [0, 1]. For a given , then  exists for all .

 

Proof. Suppose  and  and using the iteration scheme (1.1) and Lemma 2.3, we have

 

                                                (3.1)

and again using iteration scheme (1.1), we get

 

                                  (3.2)

Substituting (3.2) into (3.1), we obtain

.                                               (3.3)

This prove that  is a non-increasing and bounded sequence and hence

exists. This completes the proof.

 

Theorem 3.1. Let K be a nonempty closed convex subset of a complete CAT(0) space X and let  be a nonexpansive mapping with  and  and  be the sequences in  for some  with restriction . Suppose the sequence defined by the iteration (1.1). Then

.

 

Proof. Suppose  and . By the lemma 3.1, exists. Then by the lemma 2.3 (iii), we obtain

                 (3.4)

and

                    (3.5)

Substring (3.5) into (3.4), we obtain

                               (3.6)

 

This implies

,              (3.7)

and so

.

This implies that . This completes the proof.

 

Theorem 3.2. Let K be a nonempty closed convex subset of complete CAT(0) space X and let be satisfies condition (C). Let  be the sequence defined by (1.2) with restriction and , where  for some . Then −converges to a fixed point of T.

 

Proof. From Theorem 3.1, . Suppose  where the union is taken over all subseqeunces of such that . We claim that . Let , then there exists a subsequence  of  such that . By Lemma 2.1 and 2.2 there exists a subsequence  of  such that , since , then by Lemma 3.1 and   exists, we claim that u = v. Suppose not, by the uniqueness of asymptotic centers.

a contradiction, and hence . To show that   converges to a fixed point of T, if suffices to show that  consists of exactly on point. Let  be a subsequence of  by lemma 2.1 and 2.2 there exists subsequence  and  such that . Let and . We get seen that u = v and . we can complete the proof by showing that x = v. Suppose not, since  is convergent, then by uniqueness of asymptotic centers,

a contradiction, and hence the conclusion.

 

Theorem 3.3. Assume that X, K, T, are as in Theorem 3.2. If T satisfies condition I, then  converges strongly to a fixed point of T.

 

Proof. Since T satisfies condition (I), we get . So there is a subsequence  of  such that  for some  for all . By Lemma 3.1, we obtain

.

Hence

This show that  is a Cauchy sequences in F(T). Since F(T) is closed in X, there exists a point such that . It follows that . Since exists then it must be the  .  This competes the proof.

 

The following result is immediate sequel of our strong convergence theorem.

Corollary 3.1. Let K be a nonempty closed convex subset of a complete CAT(0) space X and let  be a nonexpansive mapping with  and be the sequence in  for some  with restriction . Suppose the sequence defined by the iteration (1.2). Then .

 

 


4. REFERENCES:

[1]   Bridson, M. and Haefliger, A., Metric spaces of Non-Positive Curvature, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1999.

[2]   Bruhat, F. and Tits, J., Gropes rŽeductifs sur un corps local. I. DonnŽees radicielles valuŽees, Inst. Houtes ŽE tudes Sci., Publ. Math. 41(1972), 5-251.

[3]   Chaoha, P. and Phon-on, A., A note on fixed point sets in CAT(0) spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 320(2006), 983-987.

[4]   Dhompongsa, S., Kaewkhao, A. and Panyanak, B., Lim’s theorems for multivalued mappings in CAT(0) spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 312(2005), 478-487.

[5]   Dhompongsa, S., Kirk, W.A. and Panyanak, B., Nonexpansive set-valued mappings in metric and Banach spaces, J. Nonlinear and Convex Anal. 8(2007), 35-45.

[6]   Dhompongsa, S. and Panyanak B., On _-convergence theorems in CAT(0) spaces, Comput. Math. Appl. 56(2008), 2572-2579.

[7]   Espinola, R. and Fernandez-Leon, A., CAT(k) spaces, weak convergence and fixed points, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 353(2009), 410-427.

 

[8]   Fujiwara, K., Nagano, K. and Shioya, T., Fixed point sets of parabolic isometries of CAT(0) spaces, Comment. Math. Helv. 81(2006), 305-335.

[9]   Kirk, W.A., Geodesic geometry and fixed point theory. In Seminar of Mathematical Analysis (Malaga/Seville, 2002/2003), pp.195-225. Colecc. Abierta, 64, Univ. Sevilla Secr. Publ., Seville, (2003).

[10]         Kirk, W.A., Geodesic geometry and fixed point theory II. In International Conference on fixed point theory and applications, pp.113-142, Yokohama Publ. Yokohama (2004).

[11]         Kaewcharoen, A. and Kirk, W.A., Proximinality in geodesic spaces, Abstr. Appl. anal. (2006), 1-10.

[12]         Kirk, W.A., Fixed point theorems in CAT(0) spaces and R-trees, Fixed Point Theory Appl. Vol.2004(2004), 309-316.

[13]         Kirk, W.A. and Panyanak, B., A concept of convergence in geodesic spaces, Nonlinear Anal., TMA, 68(2008), 3659-3696.

 

 

[14]         Laokul, T. and Panyanak, B., Approximating fixed points of nonexpansive mappings in CAT(0)spaces, Int. Journal of Math. Anal. 3(2009), 1305-1315.

[15]         Lim, T.C., Remarks on some fixed point theorems, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 60(1976), 179-182.

[16]         Mann, W.R., 1953, ”Mean value methods in iteration,” Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 4, pp.506-510.

[17]         Puttasontiphot, T., Mann and Ashikawa iteration schemes for multivalued mappings in CAT(0) spaces, Appl. Math. Sci., Vol.4, No.61(2010), 3005-3018.

[18]         Senter H.F. and Dotson W.G., Approximating fixed points of nonexpansive mappings, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 44(1974), 375-38.

[19]         Thianwan, S., Common fixed points of the new iterations for two asymptotically nonexpansive nonself-mappings in a Banch space, J. Omput Appl. Math. 224(2009), 688-695.

 

 

Received on 10.03.2013    Accepted on 12.04.2013        

Modified on 17.04.2013©A&V Publications all right reserved

Research J. Science and Tech 5(3): July- Sept., 2013 page 368-374